The first day of Google was, as expected, overwhelming and full of new faces, new systems and an onslaught of information. I think, however, the most useful thing to discuss would be the glaring differences between my former companies - record labels - and Google.
Most of the differences were related to monetary issues, as would be expected. The record industry is in turmoil due to the digital revolution, whereas Google has been a key player in causing that very revolution. I received a new mac laptop, an android phone and a desktop within my first hour of being on-site at Google. At Universal Records, it took me two years of begging to get a company blackberry. Each of the floors at Google is equipped with 5 photocopy machines which print, scan and copy documents in the blink of an eye, whereas I had to lobby Virgin Records' finance department for 6 months to get a $110 scanner for the publicity department.
The importance and significance of these is not in the material aspect, but rather the concepts behind the companies. Google believes that if employees are enabled with the most current products, they will be free to innovate and create. They manage the company in teams and there is very little hierarchy involved. Record labels, on the other hand, have been slower to adapt to this concept of freedom for their employees. Beauracracy still reigns supreme in the music industry, and while inventive start-ups such as Google have risen to the top, music giants Sony, EMI, Universal and Warner Brothers, who have failed to reform their structure, are very rapidly sinking.